Member LoginMember Login - User registration - Setup as front page - Add to favorites - Sitemap U.S. guilty of "coercion diplomacy": FM spokesperson !

U.S. guilty of "coercion diplomacy": FM spokesperson

Time:2024-05-21 20:54:55 source:International Issue news portal

   

  BEIJING, June 6 (Xinhua) -- A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson lashed out at the United States on Monday, saying that the United States has been engaging in "coercion diplomacy" and that China is ready to work with all countries upholding justice to oppose all forms of coercive acts around the world.

  Spokesperson Zhao Lijian made the remarks at a daily press briefing in response to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken's recent comments accusing China of "coercion diplomacy."

  It is the United States that engages in "coercion diplomacy," Zhao said, adding that China has never resorted to any act of coercion and is firmly opposed to any other country doing so.

  When China's national sovereignty and dignity are coerced or abused, China takes reasonable and lawful countermeasures to defend its legitimate rights and interests and uphold international fairness and justice, the spokesperson said.

  Calling the United States the "culprit" of "coercion diplomacy," Zhao said the invention rights, patent rights and intellectual property rights of "coercion diplomacy" belong only to the United States.

  To further expose U.S. actions in pursuit of "coercion diplomacy," Zhao cited practices such as unscrupulously suppressing China's Huawei and other foreign companies, and forcing countries to pick sides in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, while frequently threatening to use unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. What's more, he added, when China and the Solomon Islands inked a security cooperation deal based on mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit, the United States immediately pressured the South Pacific island countries to impede normal cooperation with China.

  Zhao urged the United States to end "coercion diplomacy," cease interference in the internal affairs of other countries, and refrain from pressurizing countries to choose sides, misusing unilateral sanctions, and oppressing the high-tech firms of other countries.

Related information
  • Nigella Lawson, 64, reveals she would 'never take Ozempic' as a weight
  • Xi Meets Merieux Foundation President and His Wife
  • Ignoring reality
  • Locals slam 'Britain's worst cycle lane' claiming it is still dangerous
  • US overdose deaths dropped in 2023, the first time since 2018
  • Commentary: CIFTIS opens door of cooperation wider for shared benefit
  • 1 killed, multiple injured as storms hit U.S. South
  • Residents of Beijing
Recommended content
  • Farm family’s newest crop shows China’s solar ascendancy
  • Commentary: Sowing discord, fanning flames no good for peace in Middle East
  • Anqing developed agriculture and ecological breeding industries to expand income
  • Commentary: Forced labor fallacy debunked by facts
  • Analysis: Larson enters conversation with Verstappen as best drivers in the world
  • Commentary: China, a doer in advancing global climate governance